James Eillis Shepherd v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant, a state prisoner convicted of rape and attempted rape, appeals from an order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus without an evidentiaryhearing. We affirm.(1) The petition alleged that appellant was deprived of his rights of confrontation and cross-examination. The district court correctly dismissed this claim as being a bare conclusion, unsupported by allegations of underlying fact. Berry v. California, 363 F.2d 754, 755 (9th Cir. 1966); Schlette v. People of State of California, 284 F.2d 827, 834 (9th Cir. 1960).(2) It was alleged that appellant was convicted on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arnold Sanchez Fernandez v. John H. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Larry G. Linebarger v. State of Oklahoma and Ray H. Page, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Schlette v. People of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Kenion v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Alberto Gonzales Barquera, Jr. v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gary L. Quigg v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of the Montana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald WawrzaszekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Harold J. Cardwell (Frank A. Eyman), Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Robinson v. WolffDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1972
- Cobb v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.