Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1964No. 380PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Defendant assigns as error the Court’s refusal to allow his motions for nonsuit and directed verdicts. Because these assign ments are fundamental and are the errors principally relied on by defendant, they must be examined and their merit evaluated before considering other asserted errors. Since the motions are directed to all five causes of action alleged by plaintiffs, each having a foundation distinct from the others, we deal with the motions as they relate to each cause of action.(1) Proceeds of sale of the Homeplace and Miller property. The following facts are admitted in the pleadings…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Bond v. Pickett Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. FARMERS BANK, ETC. v. Michael T. Brown DistributorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Hines v. TrippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Lee v. ConroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Sampson-Bladen Oil Co., Inc. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API