Legal Opinion

Green Valley Ditch Co. v. Schneider

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1911No. 6484PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Gou-rt — Hon. Haeey G. Riddle, Judg’e.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Plaintiff’s rights were limited and only attached to the water discharged from the Tegeler lateral, whatever that happened to be, after the defendants and cross-complainants had supplied their own wants and necessities. This does not vest her with any control over the ditches or laterals of appellants, *610or, the water flowing therein, nor does it obligate appellants to continue or maintain- conditions ■ so as to supply plaintiff’s appropriation of waste water at any time or in any quantity,, when- acting in good faith. — Mabee v. Platte Land Co., 17 Col. App. 476; The Fairplay Hy. M. Co. v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fairplay Hydraulic Mining. Co. v. WestonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Boulder v. Boulder & Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Lambete v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Metropolitan Denver Sewage Disposal District No. 1 v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Gallio v. RyanNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Thayer v. City of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API