Legal Opinion

Passantino v. Weissmann

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 21, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2023-2780Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEFAN PASSANTINO, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23 - 2780 (LLA) ANDREW WEISSMANN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Stefan Passantino brings this action against Defendant Andrew Weissmann, alleging defamation stemming from a September 2023 social media post. In the post, Mr. Weissmann referred to Mr. Passantino—a lawyer—as someone “who coached [a witness appearing before Congress] to lie.” ECF No. 1 ¶ 18. Mr. Weissmann moves for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). ECF No. 45. Mr. Passantino…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Jim GrahamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API