Legal Opinion
Matloob v. Village of Cahokia
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 14, 1980No. 79-481PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mme JUSTICE SPOMER
delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiff, Abdullah Matloob, is the purchaser under contract and equitable owner of a 23.5-acre tract of land in the village of Cahokia. The property has always been used for agricultural purposes, and is zoned agricultural. The plaintiff petitioned the village zoning and planning commission and the village council for a change in the zoning ordinance to designate his property R-3 (single-family, mobile home, residential) so that he could develop a mobile home park on the premises. The village council denied his request, pursuant to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- La Salle National Bank v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Krom v. City of ElmhurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Treadway v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Gregory v. City of WheatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Mundelein Estates, Inc. v. Village of MundeleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BafiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Bankers Trust Co. v. St. Clair County Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990