Legal Opinion
Roulstone v. Oesterreicher
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
Plaintiff, an attorney, suing for fees and disbursements, makes this application for summary judgment. The relationship of attorney and client is admitted. Heretofore plaintiff in a special proceeding to have his lien fixed under section 475 of the Judiciary Law obtained an order in his favor fixing the amount of his lien in the precise amount sued for herein. In view of that determination, there remains no triable issue in this case. An attorney’s lien is measured by the value of his services, (Ward v. Craig, 87 N. Y. 550.) It was held in Matter of Winkler (154 App. Div. 532) and Matter of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ward v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Leviten v. SandbankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Young v. . FarwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- In re WinklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- H. C. Roberts Electric Supply Co. v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Strobehn v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Regan v. Marco M. Frisone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg v. Polymetrics International, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Fox v. Gina Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Waxstein v. BrenhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.