Legal Opinion

Jarvis Peele et al. v. Louisville Metro Animal Services et al.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided June 23, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00620Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION JARVIS PEELE et al. PLAINTIFFS v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-CV-620-JHM LOUISVILLE METRO ANIMAL SERVICES et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Jarvis Peele and Development Academy Corporation filed the instant pro se civil action proceeding in forma pauperis. This matter is now before the Court upon an initial review of the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601

(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock,

549 U.S. 199

(2007). For the reasons that…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API