Legal Opinion
Sartain v. Blunck
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1983No. 4-183A30PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Beverly Sartain (Beverly) appeals a jury verdict awarding her $1,500 compensatory damages from defendants-appellants Ronald Bluncek (Blunck) and James Gabriel (Gabriel).
We dismiss.
We dismiss this appeal because Beverly failed to substantially comply with our appellate rules of procedure. Anglin v. Grimm, (1973) 157 Ind.App. 362, 300 N.E.2d 137.
Generally, this court prefers to decide a case on its merits. Chuck Callahan Ford, Inc. v. Watson, (1982) Ind.App., 443 N.E.2d 79. However, our rules of procedure must be followed. This Beverly has not done.
Fi…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bolen v. Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Chuck Callahan Ford, Inc. v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hughes v. County of MorganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Anglin v. GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ramsey v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bratton v. YergaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.