Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shanahan v. Sung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 2010Published

1Dissent

Green and Gorski, JJ. (dissenting in part).

We respectfully dissent in part, and would affirm. We agree with the majority that Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the Wopperer defendants (collectively, defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. As the majority concludes, defendants failed to meet their initial burden of establishing that the metallic fragment detected in the right breast of Vanessa K. Shanahan (plaintiff) in December 2005 and removed in March 2006 did not result from the June 2005 biopsy performed by defendant Paul J. Wopperer, M.D. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Williamson v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Nottingham Village Homeowner's Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Couch v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Anderson v. Nottingham Village Homeowner's Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API