United States v. Sperling
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COSTELLO, Judge:
Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of rape, sodomy, attempted sodomy and escape from custody in violation of Articles 120, 125, 80, and 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, 880 and 895, respectively. The sentence as negotiated and approved is set out above.
Two problems are before us. The first is an attack on the providence of appellant’s plea of guilty to the escape charge; the second is an assertion that the record of trial was not authenticated. We find merit in the first objection, but none in the second.
I
Appe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- McDowell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Cruz-RijosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. EllseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. AndradeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. GriffinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977