Legal Opinion
Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 27, 1985No. 85-1064PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
THE COURT: Had the conscientious secretary who started this controversy with one little dab of correctional fluid known what would ensue, I wonder whether she would have ever taken that first typing course.
The plaintiff in this action, Ameron, Inc., was the lowest bidder on a pipe-cleaning project for West Point Military Academy. Ameron’s bid was $1,033,000. The next lowest bid was submitted by Spiniello Construction Company with a bid of $1,255,000. Ameron’s bid was, however, rejected by the Army Corps of Engineers as “nonre-sponsive” and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Synar v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Interstate Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Lear Siegler, Inc., Energy Products Division, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Appellants/cross- Lear Siegler Inc., and United States Senate United States House of Representatives, Plaintiffs- Intervenors-Appellees v. John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy William Stevenson, Contracting OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.