Legal Opinion · Dissent

South Main State Bank v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1963No. 11053Published

1DissentHughes, Justice

Assuming that the assignment to the South Main State Bank of Houston was not in proper form to be filed,1 I believe that *950our decision should be controlled b.jr the judgment of the Supreme Court in Quinn v. Dupree, 157 Tex. 441, 303 S.W.2d 769, In .the recent case of Parker Square State Bank v. Triangle Supply Co., 364 S.W.2d 418 cited to us by Appellees, and relied upon in .the majority opinion, Judge Grissom, for the- Eastland Court, in referring tp. Quinn states :■ “The opinions do not disclose whether notice of the assignment was re-, corded. Article 260 — 1 was not mentioned.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quinn v. DupreeTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Scarborough v. Victoria Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Keeran v. SalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Parker Square State Bank v. Triangle Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Mitchell, Gartner & Thompson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API