Legal Opinion

Lovett v. Harrison

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1931No. 29557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

A motion has been filed to dismiss this appeal for two reasons: First, the transcript of the record was not filed until after the return day thereof; and, second, the appeal bond is defective.

The appeal bond is defective both as to the competency of the sureties thereon and the amount of the penalty thereof, and a motion to dismiss the appeal for that reason has been met by a request for leave to substitute a new and proper bond. Section 3375, Code of 1930, provides that, ‘ ‘ an appeal to the supreme court shall not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction because of a defect . . . in the bond .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cleveland State Bank v. Cotton Exchange BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Thorsen v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hudson v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hicks Merchantile Co. v. MusgroveMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snipes v. Commercial & Industrial BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Denkmann Lumber Co. v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Williams v. J.E. WaltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  4. First National Bank of Vicksburg v. CutrerMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lipson v. LipsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API