Legal Opinion

Cleveland State Bank v. Cotton Exchange Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court ’of Bolivar county. •Hon. W. A. Alcorn, Jr., Judge. Petition for mandamus by the Cotton Exchange Bank against the Cleveland State Bank. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appealed without bond. Motion to dismiss appeal overruled. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal in this case because no bond was filed by appellant. The Cleveland State Bank was a county depository, and as such had certain funds in its charge. The superintendent of education issued certain warrants on account of school funds which were in the said depository, and the revenue agent filed a suit enjoining the Cleveland State Bank from paying said warrants on the ground that they were issued without authority of law. No one *769was made a party defendant to the suit except the Cleveland State Bank.

The Cotton Exchange Bank acquired certain of these warrants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hudson v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. May v. LaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lovett v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Purity Ice Cream Co. v. MortonMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Sabougla Drainage Dist. No. 2 v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Watson v. HolifieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API