Legal Opinion

United States v. Warren

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1977No. 9911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:

In this government appeal 1 we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss an indictment on the ground that it was based in part on information he had provided the government under a promise of use and derivative use immunity. We cannot disagree with the trial court’s construction of the immunity agreements in question. Because we also conclude its findings are supported by the evidence, we affirm.

The record indicates that in earlier proceedings appellee Warren was tried and convicted in late 1973 of a series of armed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. Gary R. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Aiken v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API