Farren v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BUMGARDNER, Judge.
Edward Farren appealed his convictions of driving under the influence (second offense) and refusing to submit to a breath or blood test in violation of Code §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-268.3. He contends the trial court erred: (1) by refusing to recuse himself, (2) by allowing the Commonwealth to make a final argument after it waived closing, and (3) by finding the evidence was sufficient to convict. Concluding that the trial court did not err, we affirm.
On appeal, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below, granting to it all reasonable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Cable v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Deaner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Everett Oshae BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Commonwealth v. PrietoFairfax County Circuit Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.