Legal Opinion

Brake v. Corning

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

JLppeal from St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGamble, Judge

1. The answer of the defendant, which was stricken out by the Common Pleas, merely presented a claim upon the plaintiffs in favor of the defendant, for alleged negligence in a matter in which they acted as the agents of the defendant. There is no connection between the claim thus set up and the note or the consideration of the note sued on by the plaintiffs. It is an independent set-off of unliquidated damages, which is not to be allowed. Cowan v. Modrell, 15 Mo. Rep. 424. Johnson v. Jones, 16 Mo. Rep. 494.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is, with, the concurrence of the other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gilbert v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. May ex rel. Lackland v. KellarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API