Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Jones

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Jackson Circuit Court. contended that, under section 12 of article T of the new code of practice, the set off was admissible.

1Opinion of the Court

Gamble, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.. Johnson sued Jones and others, alleging that in consideration of his giving the ground upon which a railroad was to be located through his land, the defendants, as members of the association for constructing the road, agreed to make a fence of a certain description on each side of the ground so given, and alleges the failure to make the fence, with a statement of the damages he had sustained thereby. The defendants, in their answer, admit the facts stated in plaintiff’s petition, and by way of defence, set up as an offset a balance due from…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Broadwell v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Hayden v. McHaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Mahan v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  5. Brake v. CorningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API