Legal Opinion

Universal Brush Co. v. Sonn

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 1907No. 195PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. The decree of the Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York held valid and infringed the first claim of letters patent No. 717,014, granted December 30, 1902, to William Morrison, for a new and useful improvement 'in making brushes. The opinion below is reported in 146 Fed. 517.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The Morrison patent belongs to an old and crowded art. A generic patent in such an art would seem out of the question; at all events we are convinced that we are not now dealing with such a patent.

The principal feature of the invention consists in the method of making brushes, having a chambered frame or back of any desired material, by inserting tufts of bristles into heated, plastic composition deposited in the charhber, which composition when cool holds the bristles firmly in position. The claim in controversy sufficiently describes the invention. It is as follows :

“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. National Progress Bunching-Machine Co. v. John R. Williams Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. Homer Brooke Grass Co. v. Hartford-Fairmont Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. Dey Time-Register Co. v. W. H. Bundy Recording Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1909
  4. Stafford v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1908
  5. American Can Co. v. Goldee Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API