Legal Opinion
Dey Time-Register Co. v. W. H. Bundy Recording Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1909No. 7,174PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit to restrain alleged infringement of certain claims of United States letters patent No. 780,011, dated March 28, 1905, for new and useful improvements in time-recorders, and which letters patent were issued to John Dey and Alexander Dey.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The alleged invention disclosed and claimed in the patent in suit relates to time-recorders, and, says the patent:
“While as to some of its features the invention may bo applied to various classes óf printing or recording machines, the invention is moro particularly *808directed to certain improvements in time-recorders adapted for recording the times of entering or leaving a factory or other establishment of the individuals ■employed therein.”
The patent further says:
“One of the objects of the invention; is to provide means In a workman’s time-recorder whereby records of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fowler & Wolfe Mfg. Co. v. McCrum-Howell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Chrysler Light & Power Co. v. City of BelfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- E. H. Freeman Electric Co. v. Weber Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915