Conkright v. Frommert
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Breyer
I agree with the Court that “[pjeople make mistakes,” ante, at 509, but I do not share its view of the law applicable to those mistakes. To explain my view, I shall describe the three significant mistakes involved in this case.
*523I
A
The first mistake is that of Xerox Corporation’s pension plan (Plan) and its administrators (collectively, Plan Administrator or Administrator), petitioners here. The Plan, as I understand it, pays employees the highest of three benefits upon retirement. App. 29a-31a. These benefits are calculated as follows (I simplify and use my own words, not those of the Plan):(1)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.