Legal Opinion · Dissent

Conkright v. Frommert

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 2010No. 08-810Published

1DissentJustice Breyer

I agree with the Court that “[pjeople make mistakes,” ante, at 509, but I do not share its view of the law applicable to those mistakes. To explain my view, I shall describe the three significant mistakes involved in this case.

*523I

A

The first mistake is that of Xerox Corporation’s pension plan (Plan) and its administrators (collectively, Plan Administrator or Administrator), petitioners here. The Plan, as I understand it, pays employees the highest of three benefits upon retirement. App. 29a-31a. These benefits are calculated as follows (I simplify and use my own words, not those of the Plan):(1)…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API