Legal Opinion
In Re Escheat of Monies Deposited in United States District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 30, 1951No. 10267_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The appeal at bar presents an interesting question as to the jurisdiction or power of the United States District Court in forfeiture 1 in contrast to that of a State trial court in escheat. On October 10, 1949 the United States filed a petition in the court below for forfeiture of bribe Money in the custody of the Treasurer of the United States. The petition alleges that six individuals offered bribes to officials of the United States. The petition does not set up the dates 2 of the crimes but goes on to allege that the six persons were indicted and either entered pleas of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oliver T. Carr, Jr. v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Stapleton v. Two Million Four Hundred Thirty-Eight Thousand, One Hundred and Ten DollarsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Peerless Casualty Company, Surety for Delores Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- In re Moneys Deposited in & now Under the Control of the United States District CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Mims v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.