Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Guy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1955No. Calendar 46,567PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

On leave granted (see Michigan Court Rule No 60, § l[b] [1945]), plaintiff appeals in the nature of mandamus from an opinion and an order of the circuit court granting a new trial. We hear the appeal as a motion. See Michigan Court Rule No 70, § 2 (1945). Appellant prays that we direct the trial court to set aside its order (made on plaintiff’s declination to remit $3,000 from the verdict) granting a new trial and that we direct the trial court to re-enter the judgment entered by the clerk on the verdict of $5,000 damages in favor of plaintiff against the defendants. Defendants have not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hintz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Von Essen v. VosMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Guenther v. WhiteacreMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Teasel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Schwartz v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Donovan v. GuyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Parson v. Cadillac Outfitting Furniture Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API