State v. Nimmo
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences on one count of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and one count of possession of phenobarbital with intent to deliver in violation of § 204.401(1), The Code. The determinative question is the sufficiency of defendant’s objections to opinion testimony on the subject of his intent to deliver the drugs. We reverse and remand.
During defendant’s trial, Des Moines police officer Larry Leitzke was permitted over defendant’s objections to answer questions regarding the intent with which defendant possessed quantities of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. DrosteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- State v. TrudoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- In Re Detention of PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- State v. BreitbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.