Legal Opinion

State v. Tapack

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 6, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error to Passaic Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

Richard Coyle and Louis Tapack were indicted by the grand jury of Passaic county jointly upon five counts; the first, for breaking and entering by night a certain silk mill named in the indictment; the second, for the samo by day; the third, for entry without breaking; the fourth, for grand larceny of seven hundred pounds of raw silk, and the fifth, for receiving stolen goods. Coyle turned state’s evidence and was the principal witness against Tapack, testifying that the latter had incited him to commit the crime in the mill where he was or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ZdanowiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  2. Sherlock v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  3. Burnett v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. Dean v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
  5. State v. MacQueenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  2. Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. King v. PatrylowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Guzzi v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API