Continental Cablevision of Michigan, Inc v. City of Roseville
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
Petitioner appeals from an adverse decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal which upheld petitioner’s personal property tax assess- merits for the tax years 1982, 1983, and 1984. We affirm.
Petitioner provides cable television services in the City of Roseville. Petitioner’s system consists of three primary components: (1) the main cables which run along utility poles or are buried underground; (2) the "house drops,” which run from the main cables into individual residences and end at the television sets; and (3) the "converters” which interface the television sets with the cable system. It is the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Morris v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Michigan National Bank v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Peninsular Stove Co. v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Teledyne Continental Motors v. Muskegon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Cablevision of Michigan, Inc v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Continental Cablevision of Michigan, Inc v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1988