Legal Opinion

State v. Breed

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 13, 2015No. 2013-288PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hayes, Supr. J.,

¶ 1. Specially Assigned. Defendant appeals jury convictions for sexual assault and sexual assault of a vulnerable adult based on a single incident. He argues that the court erred by: (1) allowing a three-week separation period between jury selection and the commencement of his trial; (2) denying his motion to dismiss one of the convictions on double-jeopardy grounds; and (3) admitting the hearsay testimony of the complainant’s brother under the excited-utterance exception. We vacate the sexual assault conviction on double-jeopardy grounds, but reject defendant’s other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. RobideauMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. SorrellDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. Miles DowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  3. State v. Leo Paul Pratt IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. Jason L. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. State v. Onix Fonseca-CintronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API