Legal Opinion

Kealoha v. Machado.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2013No. SCAP-11-0001103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RECKTENWALD, C.J.

Samuel L. Kealoha, Jr., Virgil E. Day, Josiah L. Hoohuli, and Patrick L. Kahawaio-laa (collectively, Plaintiffs), brought this suit against Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) trustees, 1 alleging that the OHA trustees improperly expended trust funds on Hawaiians, as opposed to native Hawaiians as defined by the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act (HHCA). 2 Plaintiffs argued that these expenditures violated the OHA trustees’ duty to expend trust funds “in the sole interest” of native Hawaiians, as required under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 10-3(1), §§ 4 and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gonsalves v. Nissan Motor Corp. in Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Akina v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Lumford v. OtaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Keli'i Akina v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Michael Camacho v. Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai and Certified Management Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026
  5. Smallwood v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API