Legal Opinion

Layne & Brill, P.A. v. Brill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1984No. Nos. 84-699, 84-700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Stripped of immaterial factual considerations, this appeal raises a single question of law, i.e., whether a court may enter an injunction without prior notice of a hearing for that purpose, without factual findings in support of an injunction, and without providing for posting of a bond or setting forth reasons for waiving the bond requirement. We hold that it may not, on authority of Hotelerama Associates, Ltd. v. Bystrom, 449 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oxford Intern. Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Hotelerama Associates, Ltd. v. BystromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Leopold v. Richard Bertram & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinsley v. WhitedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Capella v. Coleman InstituteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Janelle v. Veterans Villas II Homeowners Association, Inc., JanelleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API