Legal Opinion

Leopold v. Richard Bertram & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 29, 1972No. 72-758PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

By this interlocutory appeal we are called upon to review the propriety of a temporary injunction. Without passing on the merits, we reverse the order granting the temporary injunction because same failed to provide for the posting of a bond. Metropolitan Dade County v. Polk Pools, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 737; Hoffman v. White, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 43; Berry v. Morgan Adhesives Co., Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 691; Rule 1.610(b), R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Dade County v. Polk Pools, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Hoffman v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Berry v. Morgan Adhesives Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sunrise Point, Inc. v. FossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Crow, Pope & Carter, Inc. v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. City Nat. Bank v. SOMERSET DEVELOP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Layne & Brill, P.A. v. BrillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Tri-Plaza Corp. v. FieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API