Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Grievance of O'Neill

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1984No. 14347Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

An assistant attorney general, the hearing officer herein, placed the burden of proof upon the grievant to establish that he was wrongfully discharged. In effect, the warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary was acting as the employer and discharged his employee, a correctional officer, and the burden of proof rests upon the employer to justify the dismissal and to prove up the reasons for the discharge. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry Camp, 325 N.W.2d 292 (S.D.1982). Therefore, for this reason alone, ordinarily, a reversal for a new de novo hearing where the proper burden of proof is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Matter of Ackerson, Karlen & SchmittSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Application of Southern Hills Bank of EdgemontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Application of Leo's Bus Service, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In re Appeal the Grievance of MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API