Legal Opinion

Forst's License

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1904No. Appeal, No. 69PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 69, Oct. T., 1904, by Morris Forst, from judgment of Superior Co., April T., 1904, No. 14, reversing order of Q. S. Allegheny Co., March T., 1908, No. 61, granting a wholesale liquor license in re Application for Liquor License by Morris Forst. Appeal from Superior Court. See 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 600. The opinion of the Supreme 'Court states the case. Error assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb,. Justice Potteb,

The legislature has defined in the act of June 9, 1891, the precise mode in which the court of quarter sessions shall proceed in the granting of licenses for the sale of liquor at wholesale. That mode is by petition containing certain specified statements. It is the facts set forth in the petition which settle the question of jurisdiction. If the provisions of the statute are not'followed in all matters of substance the petition is a mere nullity and cannot be considered, for the jurisdiction of the court of quarter sessions to grant licenses is purely statutory.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. McFarland v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Knox v. HiltySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sumption v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Matthew's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Oberfell's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Brown's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. In re Public Road, from Lincoln Highway to Maple AvenueLancaster County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API