White v. International Textbook Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
'Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action for malicious prosecution was dismissed as to defendant Griswold during the trial. The verdict was in favor of defendant Crane and against the International Textbook Company, and judgment was entered accordingly: The company and plaintiff appeal; that of the company being first perfected.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The facts are recited in the opinion rendered on the former appeal 144 Iowa, 92. The rulings therein, as the evidence at the last trial did not differ materially from that adduced at the first, must be regarded as the law of the case. Several new points were raised on the last trial and these may be considered.
1. Malicious Prosecution: appeal: question not raised below. I. The company’s superintendent at Cedar Rapids was O. O. Crane, who caused plaintiff’s arrest. After the latter had been in jail several hours, Heneh called on Crane and proposed to furnish the money necessary, if Crane would…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Langford v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Markley v. SnowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Brown v. RandallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Emery v. GinnanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
- Craig v. GinnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Maine v. James Maine & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- White v. International Text Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Williams v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Riegger v. Bruton Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Hobbs v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.