Deck v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.
This is the fifth action to come before this Court involving murders committed in 1996 by Carman Deck (“Movant”). Mov-ant filed this Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding, asserting that his counsel at the penalty phase of his capital murder trial was ineffective for failing to call certain witnesses and for other alleged deficient performance. He also alleges that the motion court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. This Court finds no error and affirms the denial of Rule 29.15 relief and the denial of Movant’s request for a new trial.
I. Background
In February…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Lance C. Shockley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.