Legal Opinion

Dollar Savings Bank v. Duff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1920No. Appeal, No. 106PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 106, Oct. T., 1920, by pláintiff, from order of O. P. Beaver Co., Dec. T., 1918, No. 277, making absolute rule to permit payment of money into court in case of Dollar Savings Bank, for use, etc., v. Bose M. Duff, Administratrix. Petition to pay money into court. Before Baldwin, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court granted a rule, which it subsequently made absolute. The use-plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was order, quoting it.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

On April 25, 1895; John C. Duff, the then owner of a tract of land in Beaver County, executed a written lease to C. R. Swetland & Sons of a vein of coal and all the fire clay beneath it, together with the iron ore and sand bank in three acres of it. The term of the lease was twenty years. By certain assignments all the rights of Swetland & Sons passed to the Darlington Brick & Mining Company. At the time Duff executed the lease the land was subject to a mortgage for $10,000 which he had given to-the Dollar Savings Bank. It was subsequently reduced to $4,000, and the Farmers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hopkins Manufacturing Co. v. KettererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Wunderle v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheaffer v. BaeringerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Kiedaisch v. Elkins Park National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Leno v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. McDonough v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Shope v. RodenhaverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API