Legal Opinion

Leno v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The primary question presented on this appeal is whether or not the equitable remedy of subrogation is available to a lessee whose enjoyment of the use of the demised property is about to be destroyed by the foreclosure of a prior deed of trust, and who, to prevent such destruction, tenders to .the holder of the secured debt the full amount of the debt and expense and demands an assignment, without recourse, or a surrender to him of the uncanceled documents evidencing and securing the debt.

It is said m 50 American Jurisprudence, 699: “The right of subrogation is not necessarily confined to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Averill v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Hopkins Manufacturing Co. v. KettererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Dundee Naval Stores Co. v. McDowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Jarrett v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Industrial Development Board v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API