Giddings & Lewis, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice ABRAMSON.
The “economic loss rule” prevents the commercial purchaser of a product from suing in tort to recover for economic losses arising from the malfunction of the product itself, recognizing that such damages must be recovered, if at all, pursuant to contract law. Twenty-five years ago, when the United States Supreme Court unanimously adopted the economic loss rule as a common-law aspect of admiralty law, Justice Blackmun observed that while product liability law grew out of a concern that “people need more protection from dangerous products” than might be…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Mt. Lebanon Personal Care Home, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Republic Bank & Trust Company v. Bear Stearns & Company., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Wright v. House of Imports, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Yung v. Grant Thornton, LLPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.