Legal Opinion
United States v. Mannino
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 25, 1991No. S 84 Cr. 1001 (PKL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Petitioner Calogero Mannino (“Manni-no”) moves pro se under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) to set aside and correct his sentence to the extent of vacating the five-year term of special parole imposed by the Court. The Court has carefully reviewed petitioner’s application, contained in an affidavit, sworn to on October 15,1991 (“Defendant’s Affidavit”), and a letter, dated November 5, 1991, from Assistant United States Attorney Jess Fardella, submitted in response to the motion. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
On October 3, 1985, Mannino pled guilty to Counts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Edwin A. Towne, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Miguel Garcia Montalvo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994