Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 5167PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

Upon application of the petitioner, a writ of review was issued by this court for the purpose of reviewing an award made by the Industrial Accident Commission of the state of California, in favor of one Oliver R. Harris and against the Southern California Edison Company, the petitioner herein.

The record includes a stipulation of facts, from which it appears that on March 6, 1923, while in the employ of the petitioner herein as a lineman, Oliver R. Harris fell from a high-tension electric pole, thereby suffering an injury to his back. Hospital and medical attention was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Matter of ViemeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Metropolitan L. I. Co. v. GoodmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Royer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dodds v. StellarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Peak v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Martin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Brown v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission & McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API