Legal Opinion

In re Assessment of Income Taxes, Ewa Plantation Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ai’peal ebom Tax Appeal Court, Oahu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J.

Ewa Plantation Company returned its gross income for the year 1906 at $1,901,928.11 derived almost entirely from sales of sugar. Against this it claimed a deduction of $1,290,109.7(> under the heading “Amounts expended in the purchase or production of movable property mentioned in Schedule A.” This with other deductions which are not in issue brought its net income, as returned, to $571,929.56, on which the tax at two *531per cent, amounted to $1 1,558.59. Included in the deduction of $1,290,109.76, as shown by the hooks of the corporation, was the amount of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The " Stephen Morgan."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Grant, Collector v. Hartford and New Haven Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Little Miami & Columbus & Xenia Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. In re Assessment of Income Taxes, Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  5. In re Assessment of Taxes, Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oleson v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
  2. In re Income Tax Appeal CasesHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bannister v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In re Assessment of Income Taxes Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In re Ewa Plantation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API