Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bannister v. Lucas

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1912Published

Exceptions prom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OP

PERRY, J.

This is an action of -assumpsit for principal and interest on a promissory note for $1000 executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant in her answer admits the execution and delivery of the note and pleads its-payment in full save as to the sum of $62 principal and $63.47 interest and adds a counter-claim for $1068.96 for moneys advanced, presenting a net claim in favor of the defendant of $943.48. Trial was had before a jury on the issue of the payments and advances. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $1365.68.

One of the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API