Legal Opinion

Coughlin v. Election Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These petitions for writs of mandamus relate to a contested election for membership in the school committee in Lowell. Each petitioner was a candidate for election as a member of that committee. In each petition, the other petitioner was allowed to intervene. Each petition was referred to the same auditor. The parties agreed that his findings of fact should be final. An identical report was filed in each case. Each petitioner filed a motion to recommit the report, alleging errors of law in the findings and rulings of the auditor. Each motion was denied. It was agreed by all parties that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brewster v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Swift v. Board of Registrars of VotersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Clancy v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. O'Brien v. Board of Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kane v. Registrars of Voters of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Albee v. Lamson & Hubbard Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Gilligan v. Registrars of Voters of WilmingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Munn v. DabrowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API