Wilson v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.
The plaintiff, appellant herein, argues that the verdict of the jury which awarded plaintiff three thousand dollars is grossly inadequate, was rendered under the influence of passion and prejudice, and was so manifestly against the weight of the evidence that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.
The accident, which is claimed to have produced the injuries to the plaintiff’s person, was a rear-end three car collision.
No real controversy exists with regard to the defendant’s liability.
Plaintiff claimed that low back injuries sustained in the accident made it necessary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. OwenIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Thompson v. Healzer Cartage CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Grissom v. Dahart Ice Cream Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCabe v. Sitar, 06 Be 39 (6-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Clemens v. Gilbert, 06 Be 57 (11-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Perry v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Sanders v. GabbardOhio Court of Appeals · 2012