Clemens v. Gilbert, 06 Be 57 (11-9-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellants Stacey and Robert Clemens filed a complaint for personal injury and loss of consortium in the Belmont County Court of Common Pleas stemming from an automobile accident. The case proceeded to jury trial on the issues of proximate cause and damages. Stacey's family doctor and her chiropractor testified at trial. Appellee Gerald S. Gilbert called a Civ.R. 35 rebuttal physician to testify, as well as a clinical psychologist. The jury awarded zero damages. Appellants filed a motion for a new trial based on inadequate damages. The court overruled the motion, and it is that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Mannion v. SandelOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Bland v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Eagle American Insurance v. FrenchoOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stancourt v. Worthington City School Dist., 07ap-835 (9-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008