Legal Opinion

Poynter v. Poynter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1992No. 33A05-9110-CV-350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Doris D. Poynter appeals the modification of child support. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

ISSUES

1. Did the trial court err by subtracting social security disability benefits payable to the children from the total support obligation of both parents before allocating support to each?

2. Did the court abuse its discretion by not making the effective date of the modified support order the date the modification petition was filed?

3. Did the court abuse its discretion by phasing in the increased support?

4. Did the trial court err in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chase v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hawkins v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Guthmiller v. GuthmillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Stultz v. StultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Downs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Peterson v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API