Legal Opinion

Stafford, Blalock & Co. v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Homestead. Debtor and creditor. Estoppel. Before Judge Ha'll. Pike Superior Court. April Term, 1877. Beported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

This case involved the question of the effect of a general waiver of the right of homestead made in a promissory note. The question was submitted to the judge without a jury, on the following agreed facts: Stafford, Blalock & Co., held a note against Z. IT. Elliott, dated and due in 1873. Stafford, Blalock & Co., sued the note to judgment, execution was issued thereon and levied upon one hundred and fifty acres of land; the note was an ordinary promissory note, except that it contained a waiver of the right of homestead, what is commonly called a general waiver; at the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kneettle v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moran v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Broach v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Boroughs v. White & StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Ragan, Malone & Co. v. TaffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Traders Investment Co. v. Macon Railway & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API