Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Radio Supply House v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 23, 1938No. Nos. 7024, 7025, 7027PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
These three cases are here on one record and were heard by us as one case. The appeal is from an order authorizing WATR, licensee of a radio station at Waterbury, Connecticut, to change its frequency from 1190 kc. to 1290 kc., to increase its power from 100 watts to 25.0 watts and its hours of operation from limited to unlimited time. Appellants are Pittsburgh Radio Supply House, licensee of station WJAS in Pittsburgh, Intermountain Broadcasting Corporation, licensee of KDYL in Salt Lake City, and Head of the Lakes Broadcasting Company, licensee of station WEBC in Duluth. Each operates on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pulitzer Pub. Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Great Western Broadcasting Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Universal Service Wireless, Inc. v. Federal Radio CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Simmons v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, a Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Herman E. Sayger, Tr/as Sayger Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.