Legal Opinion

Pickard v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 15, 1940No. 317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The taxpayer contracted to sell 300 shares of Station stock for $175,200, a price greatly in excess of its cost. For the admitted purpose of avoiding a tax on tjie profit he would realize if paid in cash, he engaged in an elaborate series of transactions which resulted in giving him $3,700 in cash and the stock of two newly created corporations whose assets consisted of United States Treasury notes equal in value to the balance of the purchase price of the Station stock. He contends that he is relieved from tax because each of the steps in his elaborate plan is a non-taxable transaction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Minnesota Tea Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bassick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Electrical Securities Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. Hendee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The South Bay Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Mary Archer W. Morris Trust, North Carolina National Bank, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API