Legal Opinion

Marel v. City of Tonganoxie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1958No. 40,925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action by a property owner to recover damages from defendant city alleged to have resulted from a change of grade of a street in front of his property.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining in part defendant’s motion to strike certain allegations of the petition and to make other portions thereof definite and certain.

Plaintiff frankly concedes that the ruling in question ordinarily would not be an appealable order (Parrack v. Wittman, 180 Kan. 193, 302 P. 2d 1005; Nausley v. Nausley, 181 Kan. 543, 545, 313 P. 2d 302), but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nausley v. NausleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Parrack v. WittmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Bob May Chevrolet Co. v. City of HugotonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vakas v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API