Marel v. City of Tonganoxie
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
This is an action by a property owner to recover damages from defendant city alleged to have resulted from a change of grade of a street in front of his property.
Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining in part defendant’s motion to strike certain allegations of the petition and to make other portions thereof definite and certain.
Plaintiff frankly concedes that the ruling in question ordinarily would not be an appealable order (Parrack v. Wittman, 180 Kan. 193, 302 P. 2d 1005; Nausley v. Nausley, 181 Kan. 543, 545, 313 P. 2d 302), but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nausley v. NausleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Parrack v. WittmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Bob May Chevrolet Co. v. City of HugotonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vakas v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962