Legal Opinion

Parrack v. Wittman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1956No. 40,010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was an action to recover commissions alleged to be due for the sale of merchandise under an oral contract of employment. From an order of the trial court overruling their demurrer to plantifFs petition, as amended, defendants appeal. Plaintiff did not appear in this court or make any attempt to defend the trial court’s rulings on the questions presented. We do not approve of such action on the part of a prevailing party.

Summarizing the petition, as amended, it alleged defendants were partners in the merchandising business, and on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Farney v. HauserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Gillen v. StangleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marshall v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Wycoff v. Winona Feed & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Liberty Glass Co. v. BathSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Vakas, Administratrix v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Otto v. SwartzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API